Politics & Prejudices
Her new book, with state’s ex-first gent, is fascinating — fascinatingly bad
Published: September 21, 2011
"You are being called to something more right now, Jen. To somewhere you're never been. This is your crucible. So many factory workers are lost, so you are lost too ... maybe it's okay for you to be lost, Jen ... my point is, you're not God. So let it go. Let go of the ego."
— from A Governor's Story, by Jennifer Granholm
Last weekend, I took time off from the tanning studio to read the memoirs of our last governor, one Jennifer Mulhern Granholm, who claims to have written this book with her husband, one Daniel Granholm Mulhern.
You may not remember now, but nine years ago, she was adored. Matter of fact, she was compared for a while to Abraham Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, Queen Boadicea, etc., etc.
One of the sillier Free Press columnists predicted that America might be inspired to change the Constitution so Canadian-born Jenny could become president. Personally, I was holding out for pope.
But it was soon discovered that Granholm, alas, had great difficulty deciding whether to order broccoli or carrots with her lunch. Once she did, she had even more difficulty sticking to her choice. Nor was she able to exercise any clout at all if the cook didn't give her what she wanted. She was spared execution by the voters, however, since she had the good fortune to run for re-election in a terrific Democratic year, against Dick DeVos, a right-wing opponent with the charm of a piece of shirt cardboard.
So she was re-elected. Things got worse economically, and so did she. At last we were liberated from Granholm, who, after professing her undying loyalty to Michigan, quickly moved to California.
By that time, she was about as popular as foot rot. Ironically, many turned against her for the wrong reasons. The national recession and the collapse of the auto industry weren't her fault.
Nor was she to blame for Comerica and Pfizer turning tail and abandoning the state, or for Mike Bishop, the Republican majority leader in the Senate, a "rigid right-winger," unable to compromise, "perpetually tan, wore shirts with his initials monogrammed on the cuffs, who used more product in his hair than I did."
However, she did completely fail to be any kind of effective leader. Once, after her re-election, her husband asked me for my advice, saying that they knew I'd been critical, but respected that I understood the shape the state was in.
Whether that was an attempt to flatter me, I don't know. What I told him was that she needed to go on television, tell the people that nobody had leveled with them, including her, and that we were in bad shape.
And then say we needed to raise taxes on those who could afford to pay; i.e., those still working, to preserve the things that mattered in this state — education and scholarships, etc.
He muttered that they might do something like that during the State of the State address. But his wife never did. In one of the most honest and candid passages in this book she admits she didn't have the guts to level with us, at least not during the re-election campaign.
"Dick DeVos and I both chose not to tell people the things that deep down we both knew to be true: That fixing Michigan was not going to be quick and easy, that our loss of manufacturing jobs was beyond the control of any governor, that we lived in a world that would never again allow high wages for low-skilled work."
But then, with the maddening hypocrisy that is her trademark, in the very next paragraph Granholm says, "It's not that either DeVos or I wanted to hide the truth from the voters."
Which brings us to the logical question: Why in the world did she write this book, anyway? Bill Milliken wrote no book about his time as governor, though he served almost twice as long in the office and left a fine record of accomplishment. John Engler and Jim Blanchard were far more successful as governors, but wrote nothing.
What was this all about? Someone who has known a lot of governors explained it to me. "This isn't for a Michigan audience. They've got her number. Nobody wants to see her, let alone buy a book she's written. We had eight years of her blowing us away.
"This is for Washington and New York audiences, to keep herself out there, to get speaking engagements and keep her job as a commentator on MSNBC, and maybe add to that."
Aw, shucks. I always was a naïve young boy.
Actually, the book, which is subtitled The Fight for Jobs and America's Economic Future, is so appallingly bad it is weirdly fascinating, starting with the weird, stilted dialogue it claims were real conversations, mainly between husband and wife.
What they actually sound like are Ayn Rand characters who have learned a whole lot of psychobabble. ("His words finally pierced my hard, self-pitying armor. It was my ego that was sucking me down." Finally, she told him "Thanks for caring so much.")
Had the former governor and defrocked "First Gentleman" been forced to give this a title reflecting the contents, this book would have undoubtedly been called, simply, Me. Or maybe, Alone.
> Email Jack Lessenberry